Evidence: Alphabetical
- Leon Panetta's five-point case for ratifying UNCLOS
- Legal certainty provided by UNCLOS is not a necessary condition for development of oil and gas resources with US EEZ
- Law of Sea structure still favors discredited and corrupt redistributionist model for foreign aid
- Lawlessness proponents claim will result from failure to ratify Law of Sea has not occurred
- Law of the Sea would subject U.S. navy seizures of foreign ships suspected of terrorism to an international tribunal
- Law of the Sea treaty will be used by environmentalists to push precautionary principle and sustainable development into international law
- Lack of legal certainty has stalled deep seabed mining industry
- Land-based mineral mining countries possess equivalent voting rights to the US in ISA
- Lawfare can impose political and strategic costs against United States
- Language in implementing advice and consent resolution limits self executability of UNCLOS tribunal decisions
- Lack of a property rights structure in space is detrimental to the development of sustainable commercial space enterprises
- Legitimacy of naval operations is an important consideration and one that would be improved by US ratification of UNCLOS
- Law of the sea convention offers best and most comprehensive protection for underseas cables
- Light and noise pollution from mingling operations could disrupt fragile ecosystems
- Legal challenges posed by cybercrime similar to those posed by maritime piracy
- Law of the sea is an ideal framework for arctic governance
- Libertarians should be concerned by the collectivist and redistributionist origins of UNCLOS
- Legal certainty provided by UNCLOS is required before companies will be willing to invest in oil and gas exploration
- Largest oil deposits in Arctic are currently off the coast of Russia
- Legal ambiguity in the Strait of Hormuz due to U.S. and Iranian non-party status to UNCLOS increases risks of conflict