On balance, UNCLOS is net positive for U.S. national security
From a national security standpoint, arguments against the United States becoming a party to UNCLOS are simply not compelling in the face of overwhelming military support for ratification.88 Becoming a party to UNCLOS will help build coalition partnerships in the Global War on Terrorism and the Proliferation Security Initiative.89 Moreover, the United States Navy's ability to respond to potential crises is critically linked to the freedom of navigation rights guaranteed by UNCLOS.90 Finally, neither large-scale military operations nor a single warship's inherent right to self- defense will be significantly impacted by becoming a party to UNCLOS.91 Indeed, the United States has declared that nothing in the UNCLOS impairs the inherent right to self-defense or rights during armed conflict, including any Convention provisions referring to "peaceful conflict" or "peaceful purposes."
Quicktabs: Evidence
Arguments
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
-
Ratification of UNCLOS would bolster U.S. national security in numerous ways, including: protecting all six core freedom of navigation rights, protect maritime interdiction rights, and supporting efforts to combat piracy.
Related Quotes:- UNCLOS supports all six core competencies of the U.S. Navy
- UNCLOS provisions directly support and improve ability of Coast Guard to complete its law enforcement and homeland security missions
- Ratification of UNCLOS would further US national security interests in multiple ways
- UNCLOS supports U.S. national security objectives by ensuring freedom of navigation rights and supporting maritime interdiction operations
- ... and 7 more quote(s)
Parent Arguments:Supporting Arguments:Counter Argument: