Consensus of experts is that joining UNCLOS would benefit U.S. foreign policy objectives
The majority view of the SFRC and the opinion of every major ocean constituency group is that joining the convention is in America’s foreign policy interests. Debating the merits of internationalism versus unilateralism is a great U.S. tradition, but the irony is that the convention actually allows for an expansion of U.S. sovereignty: freedom of movement for a powerful navy; a legal tool for U.S. forces to combat scourges at sea, such as piracy, drug trafficking, and human smuggling; and a process for extending U.S. jurisdiction over a vast amount of ocean space equal to half the size of the Louisiana Purchase.
Quicktabs: Evidence
Arguments
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
-
A broad, bipartisan consensus supports U.S. ratification of the Law of the Sea Convention, and has consistently argued on its behalf for the past 30 years. This coalition includes high-level officials from the past six administrations and backing by all Presidents since Clinton. It also includes a range of senior defense officials including every Chief of Naval Operations.
Related Quotes:- Broad consensus of groups with maritime interests support ratification of UNCLOS
- Overwhelming consensus of experts and officials is in favor of ratifying convention
- Multiple U.S. administrations have continually supported ratification of UNCLOS to preserve freedom of navigation
- Successive commissions have argued strongly for US ratification of UNCLOS
- ... and 23 more quote(s)